Tina Mochizuki vs Annabel Croft Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Mochizuki 0 - 0 Croft

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mochizuki has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Croft has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mochizuki, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Croft has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Mochizuki has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Croft has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Mochizuki has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Croft winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Mochizuki has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 50% (W/L 42/ 42), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 17/ 32). Croft has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mochizuki has played against opponents with an average rank of while Croft has played against players with an average rank of .
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mochizuki has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Croft has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Mochizuki has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Croft has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
• If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)